We report a method of estimating what percentage of people who cited a paper had actually read it. The method is based on a stochastic modeling of the citation process that explains empirical studies of misprint distributions in citations (which we show follows a Zipf law). Our estimate is only about 20% of citers read the original.
URL de trackback de esta historia http://blojj.blogalia.com//trackbacks/35929
| 1 |
|
||
|
I've been cited by authors who clearly had not read the paper (or, they read it, and they forgot it :) ). |
|||
| 2 |
|
||
|
I have been _reviewed_ by authors who clearly had not read the paper... |
|||
| 3 |
|
||
|
me too :) |
|||
| 4 |
|
||
|
Nice. That would explain why some papers make it into certain publications x)
|
|||
| 5 |
|
||
|
More on NewScientist :-) |
|||
| 7 |
|
||
|
it really Amazing Research you post. Lot of people read paper |
|||
| 8 |
|
||
|
I thought this was going to be some boring old post, but it really compensated for my team. |
|||
| 9 |
|
||
|
HDhub4u - Download All movies And Tv Shows
|
|||
| 10 |
|
||
|
best web hosting
|
|||